Collaboration Skills for School Professionals Essay

Collaboration Skills for School Professionals - Essay Example This case study revolves around Zach and Patrick who are both in 5th grade in Mrs. Anderson’s class. Mr. Alvarez is a member of the teaching staff in the school who dedicates 30 minutes of his time in assist Zach address his reading roles with a collaborative support from Mrs. Anderson who is the class teacher. However, Patrick and Zach have been causing disruptions in class whereby Patrick teases Zach by making hurtful comments and name calling causing Zach to respond angrily hence, little classroom work and instruction gets done during the interruptions which in turn affects the whole classroom. Those involved in the caseMrs. Anderson is the teacher of twenty-five fifth-grade students with thirteen boys and twelve girls. Among the twenty-five students, three of them have disabilities in learning. Zach who is one of the students in Mrs. Anderson’s class has a learning disability and he receives help from Mr. Alvarez. He particularly likes math and he particularly adore d the topic that they had just completed in class. Furthermore, he even comes to school during recesses and sometimes stays after school to feed the class guinea pig.Patrick is also one of the students in Mrs. Anderson’s class who loves participating in class plays and skits. He also participates in community sports such as softball. Other than co-curricular activities, Patrick is an average student academically and he also loves being in the class limelight by telling funny stories.

Law of the Costitution Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Law of the Costitution - Essay Example ental principles of Britain’s unwritten Constitution, and the role of judges within the context of those principles by stating that the indivisibility of Parliamentary power requires that all exercise of Governmental power must be authorized by Parliament, since it is the source of all valid authority.1 As a result, the British power of judicial review by the Courts would not include the power to invalidate Acts of Parliament, rather the Courts may only use their powers to constrain any abuse of powers by the other arms of Government, such as the legislative and executive branches2. This political and legal view is based upon the absolute and indivisible sovereignty of the British Parliament3. As stated by Dicey: (a) â€Å"Parliament has the right to make or unmake any law whatever†4 and (b) no person or body may be recognized as having the legal authority to set aside or invalidate the acts of Parliament, except Parliament itself.5 Thus, the indivisibility of Parliamentary power sets it out as the source of all valid authority.6 As a result, the British power of judicial review would not include the power to invalidate Acts of Parliament, rather the Courts may only use their powers to constrain any abuse of powers by the other arms of Government.7 Jennings has opposed Dicey’s theory by arguing for limiting of Parliamentary power by the manner and form of the process of procedural entrapment8. A piece of legislation would be deeply entrenced if amendment requires unanimous support within the Houses of Parliament. Jennings defines legal sovereignty by specifying that Parliament has power to make laws for the time being, but not to bind future Parliament. The power of Parliament to make laws is also subject to the rule of recognition that is to be recognized by the Courts, â€Å"including a rule which alters this law itself.†9 Hence law making will be conditioned by the rule of recognition, which should limit the powers of Parliament to bind successors in an era